Back to the public record guide
Proposed budget

The yearly spending plan is nearly balanced. The accumulated balance is still below zero.

The August 26 packet asks Council to review the draft and direct staff to schedule a September adoption hearing. It still isn’t the final budget.

$31.963MProposed General Fund revenuePacket p. 17
$31.944MProposed General Fund spendingPacket p. 17
$19,134Projected yearly surplusWhy staff calls the operating plan structurally balanced
-$9.723MProjected year-end General Fund balanceThe accumulated deficit remains
29.5Filled positions proposed for eliminationPlus 44.75 vacant positions
32 → 2Parks, Recreation, and Aquatics positions in the tableA staffing reduction, not a total-budget reduction
ABB summary

“Balanced” doesn’t mean the deficit is gone.

The draft proposes spending about what the City expects to receive during 2026–27. But it starts with a General Fund balance about $9.74 million below zero. The small yearly surplus only improves that to about $9.72 million below zero.

The 94% figure for Parks, Recreation, and Aquatics compares 32 budgeted positions with 2. It doesn’t show a 94% budget cut or, by itself, confirm which programs would end.

Decision status

Draft. The packet recommends another workshop on August 26 and a public hearing to consider adoption at a regular September meeting.

What’s still missing

Estimated savings for each filled position, service-restoration benchmarks, program-level effects, and the final budget reflecting Council direction.

Official sources verified August 25, 2026. The final outcome hasn’t been decided.

Back to the public record guide

Budget & Services

Read the General Fund numbers with the right context.

Official record

The proposal isn’t the final decision.

The figures below come from the proposed 2026–27 budget packet. Decisions can change during the public process.

$31.963MProposed General Fund revenuePacket p. 17
$31.944MProposed General Fund spendingPacket p. 17
$9.72MProjected negative year-end balancePacket p. 17
29.5Filled positions proposed for eliminationPacket p. 23
44.75Vacant positions proposed for eliminationPacket p. 23
32 → 2Parks, Recreation, and Aquatics positions in the staffing tableNot proof of a 94% budget reduction
ABB summary

The distinction matters.

The table shows a $19,134 annual surplus. The General Fund starts about $9.74 million below zero, so its projected year-end balance remains negative $9.72 million.

Moving from 32 budgeted positions to 2 is a staffing-table change. By itself, it doesn’t prove an equal budget reduction or confirm that every program ends. The staffing list must be read with the department pages and position list.

ABB is still assembling a verified current-versus-proposed comparison by department. It won’t be shown as complete until the categories and periods match.

Last verified: August 25, 2026.

Help keep this record accurate.

Send the source, page number, and a short explanation. ABB will publish corrections when a material fact changes.

Submit a recordSend a correctionAsk a question